TESTING DEVICES IN GUIDANCE
8.1 INTELLIGENCE TESTS
8.1.1 Intelligence : Meaning
Intelligence cannot be
explained but intelligent behavior can be explained elaborately. Nobody knows
what ‘intelligence’ is. But the .intelligent behavior can be measured through
some tests. Intelligence is the capacity of a person to act purposefully by
thinking rationally to deal effectively with his environment. Intelligence is
to understand the actual position for reacting to the problem efficiently.
8.1.2
Intelligence Definitions
Definitions given by some
eminent psychologists are given
below:
According to Alfred Binet, “Intelligence is a
capacity to think well, to judge well and to be self critical”:
According to Charles
Spearman, “Intelligence is rational thinking”.
According to David Wechsler, “Intelligence is the
aggregate or global capacity of an individual to act purposefully, to think rationally,
and to deal effectively with his environment”.
According to Stoddard,
“Intelligence is the ability to undertake activities that are difficult,
complex and abstract and which are adaptive to a goal, and are done quickly and
which have social value and which lead to the creation of something new and
different”.
8.1.3
Theories of Intelligence
Severa theories have been laid down in
regard to the nature and characteristics of intelligence. Some of these
theories are being enumerated below:
8.1.3(1)
Unitary theory I Monarchic Theory
Dr. Johnson is said to be the chief advocate of this theory.
According to this theory, “Intelligence” is the power or capacity which effects
and influences all the activities of the individual. No doubt a man has several
abilities but it is the intelligence which determines the general ability.
Criticism : It has been found that some of
the prominent people had below average abilities in many activities. e.g. Darwin had a very bad
handwriting.
2. Oligarchic
Theory
Binet is said to be the propounded
of this theory. According to this theory memory, imagination, perception,
attention. etc. are found to a limited extent in intelligence. Although these
qualities and facilities are different from one another, they are found in a
mutually interdependent position in intelligence.
Criticism : Experiments have disproved this theory. This experiment
shows that mental faculties are more or less interdependent. They are not
independent and mutually exclusive.
3.
Atomistic or Anarchic or Multi-Factor Theory
This is also known as
anarchic theory. Thorndike (Edward Lee ?homdike) is one of the most important
exponents of this theory. Multi-factor theory considers intelligence to be a
combination of numerous separate elements or factors. each of which is a minute
element of an ability.
Criticism : This theory has been criticized and contradicted by
Spearman on the basis of the experiments that he carried out.
8.1.3(2)Two-factor theory or 81-factor theory or Eclectic theory
This theory was proposed
by C.Spearman (Charles Spearman). He says that intelligence consists of two
factors ie., general factor’s’ and specific factor s’.
General factor covers the
general trend of energy which involves mental activities. Specific factor aims
at specific situations which involves all the mental activities, but some
mental activities require more G factor and less ‘s’ factor and some others require
more ‘s’ factor and less ‘G factór. Therefore, I = G ±s.
8.1.3(3)
Group factor theory or Theory of primary mental abilities
The founder of the theory
was Louis Thurstone. He states that intelligence is not constrained to two
factors, but it consists of many factors which he named as primary mental abilities
as follows.
- Verbal comprehension (V) The verbal factor which involves verbal relations, words and ideas.
- Word fluency (W) The word fluency factor deals with the ability to think of isolated words rapidly.
- Number (N) : The number factor which indicates the ability to do numerical calculations correctly nd quickly.
- Space (S) The space factor which deals with a task requiring manipulation of an object imaginatively in space.
- Memory (M) : The rote memory factor involves the activity to memorize quickly.
- Perceptual (P) The perceptual factor is the ability to perceive objects accurately.
- Reasoning {R) : The reasoning factor is the ability to make use of generalized results. All intellectual activities require more of the primary mental abilities to perform them. Therefore, I=+W+N +S+M+P+R.
8.1.3(4)
Structure of Intellect Theory or Model (S.I. Model)
Through the theory of
Structure of intellect J.P.Guilford (1967) described the structure of ability
in an elaborate manner. He says that an intellectual ability aims to perform a
particular type of cognitive operation upon a particular type of content to
produce a particular type of product.
There are five types of
operations, namely - Cognition (C), Memory (M), Divergent thinking (D)
Convergent thinking (C.) Evaluation (E), four types of contents - Figural (9,
Symbolic (S) Semantic (S), and Behavioural (B) and six types of products –
Units (U), Classes (C), Relaters (R), Systems (S), Transformations (T) and Implications
(I). Therefore, the maximum number of factors can be 6x5x4 = 120.
I.
Operation or Process
Following are the five main groups of
mental abilities:
- Cognition - it refers to discovery, re-discovery or recognition.
- Memory - it implies retention of what is recognized.
- Convergent thinking - this is the type of thinking which results in the right or best answer.
- Divergent thinking - means thinking in different directions, or searching for variety, about goodness, suitability, or adequacy of what we understand, remerpber or think.
- Evaluation - it is taking decisions about accuracy, goodness or suitability of information.
II.
Content or material : It involves four factors
- Ural Content - It is material perceived through the senses.
- Symbolic Content - It is composed of letters, digits and other conventional signs, usually organized n general systems (alphabet, number system)
- Semantic Content - It takes the form of ideas or verbal meanings.
- Behavioural Content - It refers to social intelligence or knowledge and understanding of ourselves and others.
Ill.
Products
The outcome from the
application of symbolic units, in addition to the knowledge of the kinds of
products:
- Units - Comprehending visual, auditory and symbolic units, in addition to the knowledge of the meaning of words.
- Classes - The ability to classify words or ideas
- Relations - The ability to become aware of relationship between objects because of their figural or symbolic properties and the ability to discover relations in conceptual material.
- Systems,- The ability to format objects in space, to design symbolic elements and the ability to structure problems in the preparation for .solution.
- Transformation - The ability to see what would happen to objects if they were changed, or to suggest changes in the existing circumstances.
- Implications - The ability to extend expectations and project the present information into the future happenings.
8.1.4
Measurement of Intelligence / Tests of
Intelligence
Intelligence
tests are of three types – individual,
Group and performance.
8.1.4(1) Verbal Tests of Intelligence
These tests involve the
use of language. The Binet-Simori test is the foremost-example in this
category. The tester has to explain the items of the test and then to carefully
evaluate the answer
As explained earlier the
limitations with these verbal tests are the same as with individual tests.
These test cannot be administrated on deaf and dumb children.
8.1.4
(2) Non -Verbal Tests of Intelligence
These tests do not
involve the use of language and are known as Performance Tests of Intelligence.
The child is entrusted with a task to do with his own hands in a mechanical
way.
Types
of Non-verbal Tests
- Form Board Test: Different types of performance tests are devised using ‘form boards’. Blocks of different shapes are to be fitted into corresponding holes in a board. The psychologist notes down the mistakes committed and the time taken up by the pupil.
- Picture drawing test: Children between the ages of tour to ten may be asked to draw a man with pencil on. paper. The test is scored on the completion and coherence of the drawing.
- Maze: A maze is drawn on paper with many blind alleys. The child has to trace out with a pencil the shortest path out of the maze. Here also the psychologist notes down the time and the errors committed.
8.1.4
(3) Performance Test of Intelligence
In this test individual
has to do certain operations but he need not have knowledge of reading and
writing. It is considered as the best test among all. Alexander’s Pass Along
Test and Kohs Block Design Test are considered as the best tests among all.
8.1.4
(4) Individual Tests of intelligence
When a single person is
tested by a single examiner it is called individual test of intelligence.
Example : Bines Intelligence Test, Wechsler Intelligence Scale (WAIS) etc.
8.1.4
(5) Group Tests of intelligence
When a single examiner is
given to test a number of persons at a time it is called group test. Example
Army Alpha (for iterates) and Army Beta (for illiterates) Intelligence Test
etc.
Comparison between Individual Intelligence
test and group intelligence test
Individual Intelligence test
|
Group Intelligence test
|
It is time consuming.
|
It saves time.
|
Test conducted for a person by one
examiner.
|
One examiner conducts test for many at a
time.
|
It is good for testing small children and
mentally ill people.
|
It is good for normal adults.
|
It Involves more experiments and
consumes more time.
|
Comparatively less experiments with
minimum time.
|
It consumes energy and money.
|
It saves energy and money.
|
Administered by experts.
|
By one examiner
|
When we test the individual child, he
may be ill-at-ease, nervous.
|
In a group the child is less
ill-at-ease.
|
Reliable.
|
Not much reliable.
|
Merits
- It consists of non-verbal test where there wall be no language problem. Hence persons like deaf and dumb, illiterates, foreigners, educationally backwards can be tested.
- In this test direct observation can be paid.
- It supplements the verbal tests.
Demerits
- These tests have to be done at the laboratory.
- They consume time and are difficult to manage.
- They cannot assist verbal tests; but can supplement the verbal tests.
Intelligence
Quotient (1.Q.)
Stern is the psychologist
who cultivated the idea of Intelligence Quotient (l.Q). lQ is the ratio between
mental age (MA) and chronological age (CA). That is ‘10 is got by dividing
mental age by the chronological age and multiplying it with 100. A child’s
actual age (Chronological Age i.e. CA) is 5 years, If he can successfully
perform the test items allotted to 6 year age level, then his mental age (M.A.)
is 6 years. The child’s 1.0. is calculated by the formula
l.Q = MA/CA x 100 CA
= 6/5 x 100
I.Q = 120
This 10 score 120
indicates that he is superior.
8.1.5
Uses of Intelligence Tests
Intelligence tests are
very helpful and their purposes are defined briefly below:
- Groups among students according to their mental ability can homogenously be formed for regular and unvarying progress.
- The Counselor, through’ the use of intelligence tests, can easily identify the mentally deficient children and can nose the causes behind their backwardness. This will enable him to provide remedial measures for such children.
- Children with special abilities and talents can be identified which will be useful for the teachers to encourage them accordingly.
- As educational guidance aims at providing educational materials to pupils according to their mental capacity, intelligence tests help the guidance worker.
- Employment in various professions need persons of different levels of intelligence. Once the guidance worker identifies the level of intelligence of a particular individual, he will recommend him q list of appropriate occupations and the individual will be at a convenient position to select one.
- Intelligence test helps to study the relative influence of various factors, i.e., heredity and environment, on the intelligence level of the individual.
- The individuals nature of intelligence becomes comprehensible where it is clearly exposed.
No comments:
Post a Comment